England🇬🇧 Call for Boycott RRR movie
British historian attacks RRR for casting Britishers as villains
An article criticising SS Rajamouli's RRR for misrepresenting history and suggesting that it is racist is being roundly rejected on social media.
An article declaring that RRR is a reflection of ‘the nastiness of today’s India’, and that ‘Netflix should be ashamed for promoting it’, is drawing ridicule on social media. Published on The Spectator last weekend, the article is titled ‘What Netflix’s RRR gets wrong about the British Raj’ and pokes holes in the film’s historical accuracy, accusing it of misrepresenting facts and suggesting that similar films made about Nigerians or Hindus could be considered racist. The article is written by Rob Tombs, credited an author and emeritus professor in history at the University of Cambridge.
But the Spectator writer wasn’t impressed. “To portray British officials and soldiers roaming the country casually committing crimes is a sign of absolute ignorance or of deliberate dishonesty,” a part of the article reads. The writer says that the film projects the English as the villains in ‘nationalist myths’ as an excuse for former colonies to ‘make up heroic stories about themselves’. The writer argued, “We (British) have played such an important role in the world over the last few centuries that we have accumulated enemies as well as friends. In many nationalist myths, we are cast in the role of villains. It’s a way that quite a few countries make up heroic stories about themselves.” He goes on to write, “That is no reason why we should accept these stories as true, or start apologising for things that did not happen.”
A professor at the Shawnee State University in Ohio, Dr Lavanya Vemsani, tweeted, “Needless to say, fans of the film #BritishBabu is upset that his nostalgia is being disturbed & Indians are awakening to the truth. Colonialist administration oppressed India in many ways, denying it is a crime.”
Comments
Post a Comment